Thursday, 19 March 2009

Dell's ultra-thin laptop on sale


The Adamo weighs 1.8kg and is 1.64cm thick, making it thinner, but heavier, than Apple's MacBook Air.

A spokesman for Dell told the BBC that the Adamo was a "fashion statement" and that it was the first in a range of luxury laptops from the firm.

The Adamo goes on sale at the end of the month, with a basic 1.2GHz Intel Core2D processor retailing at £1649.
"This wasn't a play against one particular brand," said Dell's marketing director, David Clifton. "This was about making a stylish product that's high in design and craftsmanship."

Economic gloom

Some might question the wisdom of launching a luxury laptop during one of the worst recessions on record, but Mr Clifton told the BBC that there was no downside to launching the Adamo at this time.

"The primary purpose of this launch is to broaden people's perception of Dell.

"There's still a luxury market out there and not many products in that market.
"We're really proud of our product," he added.
The editor of PC Pro magazine, Tim Danton, said the launch of Adamo was more about brand and perception than sales. He told the BBC that making "the world's thinnest laptop" would enable Dell to build a strong marketing campaign, just like Apple did.

"This is a 'hero product' that sits at the top of their range and, they hope, will start changing perceptions about Dell from being a businesslike brand into something more desirable.

Dell said it had put as much effort into crafting the look of the Adamo as it has refining the hardware inside.


The 34cm (13.4in) screen is powered by Intel's X4500 graphics chip, while the system is driven by an 1.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, with DDR3 system memory. The firm say the Adamo can run for up to five hours on a single battery charge.

"This is a fantastically specced-out system," said Mr Clifton.

Tim Danton said that the release would not just benefit Dell but the PC industry as a whole.

"It is vital the PC market is seen to produce attractive items.

"Times have changed and people make judgement calls not just on spec, but what something looks like and how that product reflects on them."

Source : BBC News

Baca Selengkapnya......

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

DJARUM BLACK BLOG COMPETITION


Djarum melakukan gebrakan besar didunia maya, yaitu dengan diadakannya kompetisi blog “DJARUM BLACK BOG COMPETITION”, hal ini mendapat respon dan antusias yang besar dari masyarakat terutama para penikmat dunia maya yang sering kali bergelut dengan persaingan yang semakin ketat ditanah indonesia ini, berikut salah satu cara main pada pertandingan ini...silakan dilihat dan dibaca...

OVERVIEW
Djarum Black Blog Competition adalah suatu kompetisi menulis dikalangan blogger Indonesia. Tulisan memuat pengalaman sehari-hari dan pandangan individu terhadap suatu hal.

LATAR BELAKANG
• Perkembangan yang sangat pesat pada komunitas blogger di indonesia.
• Untuk menemukan generasi baru yang lebih expressive, speak up their opinion, care to their surroundings, and creative.
• Bloging sudah menjadi Lifestyle.

SYARAT DAN KETENTUAN
1. Peserta bukan karyawan , mitra usaha dan rekanan PT Djarum.
2. Blog dibuat dan dikelola oleh WNI.
3. Tidak ada batasan pada pekerjaan, kemampuan menulis, ataupun tema blog pribadi yang dirasa kurang sesuai. Yang menjadi penilaian adalah isi dari artikel yang diajukan.
4. Artikel yang diajukan untuk kompetisi menggunakan bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Inggris dapat dipergunakan sebagai konten artikel tetapi hanya sebagai pelengkap artikel saja, bukan menjadi bahasa utama penulisan artikel.
5. Konten dari artikel merupakan tulisan dari pengelola blog.
6. Isi artikel yang diajukan merupakan hasil pemikiran pribadi.
7. Isi artikel tidak berhubungan dengan periklanan internet, tidak mengandung unsur pornografi dan pornoaksi, tidak mengandung SARA, dan bukan hasil plagiarisme.
8. Peserta dapat mencantumkan informasi produk (apabila diperlukan).
9. Menggunakan bahasa yang menarik dengan gaya bahasa apapun selama sopan.
10. Jumlah artikel yang memenuhi ketentuan keyword wajib harus lebih dari 20 artikel (tanpa ada batasan jumlah kata keseluruhan).
11. Artikel yang akan di nilai adalah artikel-artikel yang diposting pada jangka waktu yang ditentukan.


KEYWORD WAJIB
Keywords Wajib adalah kata kunci yang wajib ada pada tulisan dengan jumlah minimal 2 dari daftar berikut :
1. Djarum Black
2. Djarum Black Slimz
3. Djarum Black Slimznation
4. Djarum Black Motodify
5. Djarum Black Night Slalom
6. Autoblackthrough
7. Autoblackthrough goes to campus
8. Blackinnovationawards
9. Blackinnovationawards goes to campus
10. Black In News
11. Black Car Community
12. Black Motor Community
13. Black Community

TAHAP KOMPETISI
1. Pendaftaran
o Pendaftaran artikel blog dimulai dari tanggal 06 Desember 2008 sampai dengan 31 Maret 2009.
o Peserta kompetisi adalah pemilik blog itu sendiri. Peserta tidak dapat mengusulkan suatu blog lain.
o Cantumkan official banner di halam utama blog anda,:


o Add blog (blackoholiczone.blogspot.com) sebagai friends.
o Identitas pemilik blog (nama, nickname, alamat blog, email, lokasi/alamat, no telp/HP, pekerjaan).
1. Penjurian
• Penilaian akan dimulai dari tanggal 01-09 April 2009.
• Pemenang akan dipublikasikan di www.autoblackthrough.com/blogcompetition/ pada tanggal 10 April 2009 dan akan dihubungi lebih lanjut oleh panitia.
• Penilaian akan dilakukan pada seluruh pendaftar yang lolos registrasi dan memenuhi persyaratan serta telah dipublikasikan di www.autoblackthrough.com/blogcompetition dan blackoholiczone.blogspot.com (blogroll).
• Panitia akan memilih top 10 blog list.
• Panitia akan memilih satu blog terbaik dari top 10 blog list sebagai juara utama.
• Panitia akan memilih dua blog terbaik dari top 10 blog list sebagai juara kedua dan ketiga.
• Hasil seleksi adalah mutlak dan tidak dapat diganggu gugat.
• Panitia tidak melayani surat-menyurat diluar prosesi.
• Seleksi, kecuali surat pengaduan adanya tindak kecurangan


Baca Selengkapnya......

Friday, 13 March 2009

32-Core Processors: Intel Reaches For (The) Sun : The Project "Keifer" Awakening


Intel is of rolling out its Core 2 micro-architecture now. The Xeon 5100 server processor aka Woodcrest was released only weeks ago, Core 2 Duo for the desktop (Conroe) is expected on July 27th and the mobile version Merom will follow only weeks later. The next milestone is quad-core processors, which the firm will produce by fitting two Woodcrest dual cores inside a physical processor package (Clovertown). You may have realized that there is a product development pattern behind recent and upcoming Intel multi core processor releases. Amazingly enough, Intel has been studying Sun's UltraSPARC T1 (Niagara) to come up with a radical processor redesign for 2010 that could perform 16 times faster than Woodcrest. This is no marketing blurb, guys; this is technical intelligence from within the Borg collective.

Single/dual socket Core 2 micro-architecture versus Sun's Niagara in best/worst case scenarios. Intel believes it can beat the deadly dinosaur by 2010. The steep Intel slopes for 2008 and 2010 represent the upgrades to 45 and 32 nm as well as possible micro-architecture updates.

I have to say I can't remember performance gains anywhere near 16x in only four years. Comparing a 2002 Pentium 4 3.06 GHz with a Core 2 Extreme 2.93 GHz will give you a two to five fold increase - if most. 16x more performance by 32 cores in 2010 versus today's two cores, should it come true, equals linear scaling, which means that performance would double with the core count. Many of you will say this is utterly impossible, because even sustaining the clock speed levels at doubled core count might be difficult - and I agree, unless you start to think out of the box.

Santa Clara had some of its best brains compare the server processor roadmap with Sun's UltraSPARC T1 and expected future offsprings. The result is a project code-named Keifer. Although it was designed to come up with architecture to beat the pants off Sun in the server market by 2010, Keifer may easily be the technical basis for future server and mainstream processors as well.

Baca Selengkapnya......

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

21 LG products win the iF Product Design Award 2007


LG proudly announced this morning that 21 of their products won an iF Product Design Award 2007! Among the products, we have several TVs, LCDs, audio and video systems, phones, PCs…Seoul, Dec 07 2006 (Korea Newswire)-- LG Electronics (LG), a leader in consumer electronics and mobile communications, announced the awards for 21 remarkable products given by the prestigious iF product design award 2007, doubling its take from last year, when it received awards for 11 products. Earlier this year LG also broke industry records winning in 20 categories at the reddot design awards 2006 and became one of only two Asian teams ever to win reddot’s Design Team of the Year award.

Held annually, the iF product design award is one of the most highly regarded design-related honors in Europe. LG’s ‘Fantasy’ Monitor series, Virtual 5.1Ch Home Theater System, 3 Door Refrigerator and mobile handsets were among the products chosen for the recognition.

“At LG, we have made a strong commitment in developing great design, and the industry has clearly taken a notice,” said Sang Young Shin, Vice President of LG Electronics Digital Appliance Design Research Lab., “We see design not just as an afterthought, but as a proprietary technology. Because of this, LG has become more than just a manufacturer - we are a global leader creating innovate products which enhances the consumers’ lifestyle.”

LG’s design leadership extends even beyond its actual products. This year, LG won its first award in packaging design for its ‘Leo Phone’ - showing that the LG brand itself is becoming more and more synonymous with great design.

LG has six overseas design branches who work closely with the headquarters in Seoul in creating the product to meet the needs, desire and the dream of the customers.



Below is more details about the iF product design award 2007 winning products from LG:

‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900R)
L1900R expresses the image of ‘eternity’ and ‘communication’ through the shape of opened base. When you touch the power control, LED starts to operate in sequence, like making a ‘circle’ in the air. When the screen is turned on, it is suggested that the strength of light automatically settles soft. We tried to show luxurious and clean image by controlling the design decoration to its minimum. We hide the mechanism of cabling and hinge by reducing external parting line or separate pieces, we made the powerful performance possible within simple and attractive modeling. We expressed high gloss quality only with ABS injection without the spray.

‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900J)
L1900J resembles a section of a beautiful ceramic vase and when LED is lit, the light fills the hemisphere with the image of ‘incorporating light’ and providing dramatic expression like ' a small stage on my desk.' You can adjust the strength of LED light using 4 stages of illumination adjustment when the screen is turned on. It serves as indirect lighting during night hours and during power saving mode, it expresses the status of power on in witty manner through the Soft movement just like lights ‘are breathing’. Considering environmental friendliness, we tried to express high gloss quality only with ABS injection without separate spray.

‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900E)
L1900E expresses the mystery of universe in sophisticated curve line along with punctured circular column showing the strength and nobility of ‘lunar eclipse’ through the LED illusion in the background. We designed for users to recognize naturally that his/her PC is on by showing the reflection of background light that is reverberating through the reflection from inside of the curved stand. We hide the mechanism of cabling and hinge and by reducing external parting line, we made the powerful performance possible within simple and attractive. Exclusion of harmful materials by adopting lead free soldering, we made the whole PCB 100% lead free.

Virtual 5.1Ch Home Theater System (J10)
As a new concept, one can place the Mini Home Theater with built-in HDD in a wide variety of places. By applying Bio-Indicate Lighting, the user and the product converse each other by reacting to the user movement in through the touch sensor area to maintain a closer relationship. Its minimal shape also provides user with the high-end audio image. STAVAX mold and resin is applied, which show elegant finishing with anti-scratch function and high gloss finish. Spray is eliminated and also by applying increased aluminum adhesion, instead of the existing chrome coating which is much easier to recycle as each part can easily be detached.

Slim Card Phone (KE820)
KE820 is simple, minimal and slim which is proportional to the size of a card. 2.0” QCIF horizontal LCD screen has excellent openness which provides pleasant usability and function compared to the standard vertical screen. Central Jog-key processed with spin-hairline has sufficient element to attract attention to the front. Key pad of a chess shape is designed to the convenience of the user and to feel the firm sense of “click”. Glass fiber has excellent strength, which protects the product when it falls and absorbs shock from the outside.

3 Door Refrigerator (GR-L258SSKA)
Overall harmony of stainless steel surface treatment and black gloss detail, the new 3 Door Refrigerator pursued a sensitive design with the use of touch knob, white back lighting, and cheerful sound effect when in use. Stainless steel dispenser with magic crisper automatically adjusts to the right temperature for vegetables and fruits. Nano anti-bacteria basket prevents mold and guarantees anti-bacteria effect which received a certification in Korea. Freezer tilt drawer: With a tilting structure of cool chamber, users only have to open the door a little where they could maintain the cool air.

Package Design for ‘Leo Phone’ (KG920)
Designed for the first mobile handset with 5 mega pixels digital camera, the combination of black and fine silver gives a minimal yet dynamic image of the product. To express the image of a digital camera phone we created a new frame structure that resembles the iris of the
camera as well as a picture frame. The ‘unfolding’ structure of the frame adds the fun element to the customer. The diagonally aligned frame strongly stands out and is exceptionally durable. In order to reduce the unit cost during the production, this package only used paper and PET which is also easily recyclable and eco- friendly.

Full list of LG’s iF Product Design Award 2007-winning products:

 Plasma TV (60PY3)
 Plasma TV (50PB4)
 Plasma TV (50PC5)
 ‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900R)
 ‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900E)
 ‘Fantasy’ Monitor (L1900J)
 HDD+DVD Super Multi Recorder (RH200)
 Virtual 5.1Ch Home Theater System (J10)
 DMB MP3 (FM36)
 15.4” Wide-screen Notebook PC (P3)
 Picture frame ArtCool Air Conditioner (LSM-CO65LAJ)
 Picture frame ArtCool Air Conditioner (LS-C186G1LO)
 Mirror-type Air Conditioner (LS-C085PM/LS-C105PM)
 3 Door Refrigerator (GR-L258SSKA)
 Washer & Dryer Set (WM2496HWM + TD-V1018OEM)
 ‘Chocolate’ Folder Phone (KG810)
 Slim Card Phone (KE820)
 Mobile Card Phone (KG320)
 Mobile Phone (KE850)
 Mobile Phone (KE770)
 Package Design for ‘Leo Phone’ (KG920)

About LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc. (KSE: 06657.KS) is the global leader and technology innovator in consumer electronics, home appliances and mobile communications, employing more than 72,000 people working in over 120 operations including 80 subsidiaries around the world. Comprised of four business units: Mobile Communications, Digital Appliance, Digital Display and Digital Media with global sales at USD 34.7 billion (consolidated USD 43.4 billion) as of 2005, LG Electronics is the world’s leading provider of CDMA handsets, residential air conditioners, plasma panels, optical storage products, DVD players and home theatre system. For more information, please visit www.lge.com

About iF product design award
The iF product design award is one of the world’s three leading design awards and can look back proudly on a 50-old-year history. Every year at the Hannover Exhibition Centre some 2,000 products from around 37 nations are judged by renowned experts, with the best of them receiving an iF seal of outstanding design quality - a worldwide brand with high recognition value, guaranteeing its owner a place on the cutting edge of contemporary design. For more information, please visit http://www.ifdesign.de

Baca Selengkapnya......

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

Apple unveils the superslim MacBook Air


The new laptop from Apple is the slimmest in the world, but potential customers will need a thick wallet


Impressively thin but expensive - that would be the quick take on Apple's new laptop, Jonathan Richards writes.

The MacBook Air is an ultra-sleek notebook computer designed, like many other Apple products, to appeal to people who like devices with superior functionality and, importantly, who have healthy incomes.

It is extremely thin - at the narrowest point it tapers to just 4mm (0.16 inches), about the width of a pencil - and when waved about its aluminium finish gives it an almost blade-like quality. At its thickest point - 22mm (0.86 inches) - it is still thinner than the thinnest section of its nearest competitor - the Sony Vaio TZ, Steve Jobs, Apple's chief executive, took great pleasure in pointing out.

In his demo, Mr Jobs pulled it out of an A4-sized enveloped, much to the collective amazement - and then delight - of the crowd.

It has an impressive 13.3in screen, and while the display itself is not touch-sensitive, Apple has incorporated several of the 'touch' controls that it introduced on the iPhone in the mouse pad at the bottom of the keyboard.

A pinching gesture allows you to zoom in and out of a web page or document, while placing two fingers on the pad and twisting them lets you rotate what you are looking at - a picture, say.

Unusually, there is no built-in CD drive. Apple is betting the uses of such drives - for instance burning discs and loading software - will become less relevant as more and more services can be performed wirelessly or delivered over the internet. An external drive can be bought for £65.

All this comes at a price, though. The Air - which ships in two weeks globally - will cost £1,199, several hundred pounds more than the cheapest MacBook, but about on par with the more advanced MacBook Pro.

Another downside is that the battery cannot be removed, meaning that business users on flights, say, will be limited to its 5-hour life.

Also of note in Mr Jobs's keynote were updates to several existing Apple products.

A free upgrade to the iPhone's software means that owners will now be able to find out their current location, a feature that will radically improve the device by allowing people to search for restaurants or shops, say, in their vicinity.

The feature uses nearby mobile phone masts and wi-fi networks to locate the device's position via a process called triangulation, unlike GPS, which relies on satellites.

Apple TV - a device which enables people to watch videos in their iTunes library on their TV - has also had an overhaul. It will now be a stand-alone unit - not connected to the computer - meaning that an owner will effectively be able to access iTunes directly from their TV.

A web-based interface, which looks a bit like the existing iTunes store only less busy, appears directly on the owner's TV screen, and lets anyone - Apple and PC users alike - buy content from iTunes, to watch either on the TV or their iPod.

Combined with the new iTunes movie rental feature, which will enable iPod owners to rent new release films from all the major studios for $3.99 (£2), this will give a jolt to all the existing video-on-demand providers, including the television networks and specialists like Lovefilm.com.

The new Apple TV will cost $229 (£117), but for the time being is only available in the US.

Baca Selengkapnya......

Monday, 9 March 2009

ASUS may ship two-screen Windows 7 notebooks in Q1


SANTA BARBARA, CALIF. -- Asustek, also known as ASUS -- the people who make the Eee PC -- plans to ship new notebooks that have touch screens on both the top (where the screen normally goes) and the bottom (where the keyboard normally goes) as early as the first quarter of next year, according to a report.

OK, let's back up for a second. First of all, I described in my Computerworld.com column back in June what I believe is the future of nearly all mainstream notebooks from both Microsoft's OEM partners and from Apple. The basic design will be, I believe, one that has screens on both the top and the bottom, just like the next version of the One Laptop Per Child project. If you look at the pictures in that column, you can see the four usage modes: 1. Tablet mode. Snap the laptop open and flat, and the two screens work together as one giant touch screen.

2. Laptop mode. Open the virtual keyboard, which appears full-size on the bottom touch screen, and use like a regular clamshell laptop.

3. Book mode. Open an e-Book and hold it sideways like an open book. One page appears on the left screen and the next page appears on the right. Touch the corner to turn the page.

4. Two-person mode. Open it flat again like Tablet mode, but click a button to make one screen orient itself for one user and the other toward you.

This form-factor is useless without an advanced, MPG user interface, which I've written about in my Computerworld.com column as well. MPG stands for multi-touch, physics and gestures. The best known examples of MPG user interfaces are the Apple iPhone and Microsoft's Surface.

OK, enough with the vision. Let's look at the reality. ASUS showed off during Computex 2008 just such a system (see photo below).

The news today is that Digitimes, which covers Taiwanese manufacturing, claims that a source told them ASUS's touch panel laptops will be launched during the first or second quarters of 2009.

These laptops are reportedly designed to work with the upcoming Windows 7 operating system, which Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer promised would include a multi-touch user interface.

If the report is true, and ASUS does meet its ship target, it does not mean Windows 7 will be ready by then. It's possible that the company may offer an upgrade voucher for buyers to get Windows 7 later on.


Baca Selengkapnya......

Hewlett-Packard Company


Hewlett-Packard is the world’s largest technology company.

Primarily known as a maker of personal computers, the company is the world’s top maker of PCs and has been tied with Dell for the lead in the United States. In 2007 about $36 billion, or a third of its total revenue, came from PC sales.

About 27 percent of total revenue came from its printing division — with the bulk of its profits coming not from printers but from replacement ink cartridges.

Another third of its revenue came from selling servers and other computers, software and information technology services to large corporations. The company announced in May 2008 that it planned to buy Electronic Data Services, a technology services company, for $13.9 billion.Mark V. Hurd has served as chief executive since February 2005. An executive who tries to avoid the media spotlight, he has focused on fostering growth in three areas: outfitting and managing next-generation data centers, mobile technology, and printing in its broadest applications.

Read More...

Mr. Hurd’s strategy is to constantly find places to reduce costs, while investing in the fastest-growing areas.

Wall Street has rewarded his performance with a surge in the company’s stock. From January 2005 to June 2008, the share price has climbed nearly 140 percent, compared to 20-percent growth in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index during the same period.

The recent upturn follows a period of considerable turmoil. In mid-1999, the board selected Carleton S. Fiorina as its chief executive. Her bold efforts to merge the company with Compaq led to a proxy fight with the children of one of Hewlett-Packard’s founders. It also brought her into conflict with the board, which fired her in February 2005.

The company was rocked again in 2006 when it was revealed that Patricia Dunn, the chairman, had instituted a program to plug leaks from the board by using private detectives to spy on directors, employees and journalists who covered the company. The scandal resulted in the ouster of Ms. Dunn and the firing of several employees.

H.P. was one of the earliest technology companies in Silicon Valley, and its culture helped to define the business culture of future start-ups. Its founders, David Packard and William Hewlett, were Stanford University graduates whose professor, Fredrick E. Terman, urged them to start a business. They did so, in 1939, in a garage next to Mr. Packard’s rented home on Addison Avenue in Palo Alto, Calif.

Later, as the company added employees, the two founders insisted on an informal, non-hierarchical culture. They famously allowed access to tools and parts bins after hours so engineers could tinker on whatever they wanted in their spare time.

The men codified what they called the H.P. Way:

“A great company entrusts all its people, from top to bottom, to do the work that they were assigned, to take responsibility for their actions, and to speak for and represent the company as if they are the owners (which they are) and the founders themselves.”

The company’s first product was an audio oscillator. The two men sold it to the Walt Disney Company, which was working on the full-length animated film “Fantasia.”

In 2007, H.P. displaced I.B.M. as the world’s largest technology company by recording annual revenue of $104.29 billion.-- Damon Darlin, June 6, 2008


Baca Selengkapnya......

Sunday, 8 March 2009

CCD vs. CMOS

The technologies and the markets that use them continue to mature, but the comparison is still a lot like apples vs. oranges: they can both be good for you. DALSA offers both.

CCD (charge coupled device) and CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) image sensors are two different technologies for capturing images digitally. Each has unique strengths and weaknesses giving advantages in different applications. Neither is categorically superior to the other, although vendors selling only one technology have usually claimed otherwise. In the last five years much has changed with both technologies, and many projections regarding the demise or ascendence of either have been proved false. The current situation and outlook for both technologies is vibrant, but a new framework exists for considering the relative strengths and opportunities of CCD and CMOS imagers. Both types of imagers convert light into electric charge and process it into electronic signals. In a CCD sensor, every pixel's charge is transferred through a very limited number of output nodes (often just one) to be converted to voltage, buffered, and sent off-chip as an analog signal. All of the pixel can be devoted to light capture, and the output's uniformity (a key factor in image quality) is high. In a CMOS sensor, each pixel has its own charge-to-voltage conversion, and the sensor often also includes amplifiers, noise-correction, and digitization circuits, so that the chip outputs digital bits. These other functions increase the design complexity and reduce the area available for light capture. With each pixel doing its own conversion, uniformity is lower. But the chip can be built to require less off-chip circuitry for basic operation. For more details on device architecture and operation, see our original "CCD vs. CMOS: Facts and Fiction" article and its 2005 update, "CMOS vs. CCD: Maturing Technologies, Maturing Markets."

CCDs and CMOS imagers were both invented in the late 1960s and 1970s (DALSA founder and CEO Dr. Savvas Chamberlain was a pioneer in developing both technologies). CCD became dominant, primarily because they gave far superior images with the fabrication technology available. CMOS image sensors required more uniformity and smaller features than silicon wafer foundries could deliver at the time. Not until the 1990s did lithography develop to the point that designers could begin making a case for CMOS imagers again. Renewed interest in CMOS was based on expectations of lowered power consumption, camera-on-a-chip integration, and lowered fabrication costs from the reuse of mainstream logic and memory device fabrication. While all of these benefits are possible in theory, achieving them in practice while simultaneously delivering high image quality has taken far more time, money, and process adaptation than original projections suggested (see "CMOS Development's Winding Path" below).

Both CCDs and CMOS imagers can offer excellent imaging performance when designed properly. CCDs have traditionally provided the performance benchmarks in the photographic, scientific, and industrial applications that demand the highest image quality (as measured in quantum efficiency and noise) at the expense of system size. CMOS imagers offer more integration (more functions on the chip), lower power dissipation (at the chip level), and the possibility of smaller system size, but they have often required tradeoffs between image quality and device cost. Today there is no clear line dividing the types of applications each can serve. CMOS designers have devoted intense effort to achieving high image quality, while CCD designers have lowered their power requirements and pixel sizes. As a result, you can find CCDs in low-cost low-power cellphone cameras and CMOS sensors in high-performance professional and industrial cameras, directly contradicting the early stereotypes. It is worth noting that the producers succeeding with "crossovers" have almost always been established players with years of deep experience in both technologies.

Costs are similar at the chip level. Early CMOS proponents claimed CMOS imagers would be much cheaper because they could be produced on the same high-volume wafer processing lines as mainstream logic or memory chips. This has not been the case. The accommodations required for good imaging perfomance have required CMOS designers to iteratively develop specialized, optimized, lower-volume mixed-signal fabrication processes--very much like those used for CCDs. Proving out these processes at successively smaller lithography nodes (0.35um, 0.25um, 0.18um...) has been slow and expensive; those with a captive foundry have an advantage because they can better maintain the attention of the process engineers.

CMOS cameras may require fewer components and less power, but they still generally require companion chips to optimize image quality, increasing cost and reducing the advantage they gain from lower power consumption. CCD devices are less complex than CMOS, so they cost less to design. CCD fabrication processes also tend to be more mature and optimized; in general, it will cost less (in both design and fabrication) to yield a CCD than a CMOS imager for a specific high-performance application. However, wafer size can be a dominating influence on device cost; the larger the wafer, the more devices it can yield, and the lower the cost per device. 200mm is fairly common for third-party CMOS foundries while third-party CCD foundries tend to offer 150mm. Captive foundries use 150mm, 200mm, and 300mm production for both CCD and CMOS.

The larger issue around pricing is sustainability. Since many CMOS start-ups pursued high-volume, commodity applications from a small base of business, they priced below costs to win business. For some, the risk paid off and their volumes provided enough margin for viability. But others had to raise their prices, while still others went out of business entirely. High-risk startups can be interesting to venture capitalists, but imager customers require long-term stability and support.

While cost advantages have been difficult to realize and on-chip integration has been slow to arrive, speed is one area where CMOS imagers can demonstrate considerable strength because of the relative ease of parallel output structures. This gives them great potential in industrial applications.

CCDs and CMOS will remain complementary. The choice continues to depend on the application and the vendor more than the technology. DALSA's approach is "technology-neutral": we are one of the few vendors able to offer real solutions with both CCDs and CMOS.
Feature and Performance Comparison
Feature CCD CMOS
Signal out of pixel Electron packet Voltage
Signal out of chip Voltage (analog) Bits (digital)
Signal out of camera Bits (digital) Bits (digital)
Fill factor High Moderate
Amplifier mismatch N/A Moderate
System Noise Low Moderate
System Complexity High Low
Sensor Complexity Low High
Camera components Sensor + multiple support chips + lens Sensor + lens possible, but additional support chips common
Relative R&D cost Lower Higher
Relative system cost Depends on Application Depends on Application
Performance CCD CMOS
Responsivity Moderate Slightly better
Dynamic Range High Moderate
Uniformity High Low to Moderate
Uniform Shuttering Fast, common Poor
Uniformity High Low to Moderate
Speed Moderate to High Higher
Windowing Limited Extensive
Antiblooming High to none High
Biasing and Clocking Multiple, higher voltage Single, low-voltage

CMOS Development's Winding Path
Initial Prediction for CMOS Twist Outcome
Equivalence to CCD in imaging performance Required much greater process adaptation and deeper submicron lithography than initially thought High performance available in CMOS, but with higher development cost than CCD
On-chip circuit integration Longer development cycles, increased cost, tradeoffs with noise, flexibility during operation Greater integration in CMOS, but companion chips still required for both CMOS and CCD
Reduced power consumption Steady improvement in CCDs Advantage for CMOS, but margin diminished
Reduced imaging subsystem size Optics, companion chips and packaging are often the dominant factors in imaging subsystem size CCDs and CMOS comparable
Economies of scale from using mainstream logic and memory foundries Extensive process development and optimization required CMOS imagers use legacy production lines with highly adapted processes akin to CCD fabrication


Baca Selengkapnya......

Saturday, 7 March 2009

Hard Disk Drive

Description: The hard disk drive is the "data center" of your PC--it holds all of your programs and data. The CPU may be the "brain" of your system, but if so, the hard drive is its memory and personality--it is what makes your PC what it is. Few of us could imagine using a PC without a hard disk drive; it's a defining component of the modern PC.

Tip: For additional information on hard disk drives, including much more discussion of many of the technical details, criteria and features mentioned below (and other related topics), see the extensive Reference Guide section on hard disk drives.

Role and Subsystems: The hard disk is a key component in the storage subsystem. It plays an important role in the performance, capacity and software support of the PC. Its quality and reliability is probably more important than that of any other component, since it is the only component that you cannot just swap out with another of the same type in the event of failure--you lose your data in the process. It therefore commands significant attention, or at least, it should!Related Components: The hard disk must be matched to several other components in the system. First, it must be of a form factor compatible with the system case. Second, it must use the same interface as the controller or controllers within the PC. Finally, the selection of hard disk interface will have an impact on the selection of other storage subsystem components such as the CD/DVD drive. Usually the interface is chosen for the system and the hard disk selected to match it. Most systems use IDE/ATA, for which controllers are provided on the motherboard and no other components are necessary for compatibility. System case compatibility is also fairly universal.

Key Compatibility Selection Criteria: There are several important criteria to keep in mind when selecting a hard disk to suit your system, but most systems use standard hardware, making it actually fairly easy to find hardware that will suit your needs:

* Form Factor: Hard disks come in several different common sizes, matched to the bays in the system case where they are installed. For most desktop PCs, the standard is the 3.5" wide form factor (actually about 4" wide, but that's the name). Standard hard disks are called slimline drives and are 1" in height. For notebooks the standard is the 2.5" form factor. Most hard drives sold for PCs, and almost all for regular consumer PCs, are 3.5" slimline units.
* Interface Type: Most hard drives use the IDE/ATA interface; others, especially in high-end systems, use the SCSI interface. Those two cover 99% of the drives in desktop PCs, though there are some external drives that interface through the parallel, USB, or PC Card ports (they are used more for notebooks than desktops, actually). For most systems, you want an IDE/ATA hard disk. If you decide to buy or build a SCSI system, you need to purchase a SCSI host adapter, and make sure that you get matching drives that use a "flavor" of SCSI that the host adapter supports.
* Spindle Speed Support and Cooling: Some high-speed drives generate a significant amount of heat and may require special cooling. Some system cases, especially smaller ones, may not be able to use these faster drives without problems. Fortunately most newer drives have largely addressed these heat issues.

Performance and Capacity Selection Criteria: There are many different performance issues related to hard disks. I discuss them in gory detail here, but for selecting a new hard drive I can boil the capacity and performance issues down to the following key points:

* Capacity: Obviously, the size of the drive is an important consideration: bigger drives hold more. At the same time, don't overspend on an enormous drive unless you do a lot of downloading or working with large graphics, audio and video files. For "typical" PC uses a 50 GB drive will remain mostly empty for most people. (Of course, every time I think "drives are now big enough", a few years later I find that I'm wrong as I find new ways to fill them up!)
* Spindle Speed: One of the most important differentiators between different drive models from a performance standpoint is the speed at which the spindle spins (and thus the data platters as well). For IDE/ATA, the fastest drives spin at 7,200 RPM; slower ones go at 5,400 RPM or even 4,400 RPM. Faster drives provide both higher transfer rates and faster random access to your data. For SCSI, faster 10,000 RPM and even 15,000 RPM drives are available (at a significantly higher cost, of course).
* Seek Time: This specification, given in milliseconds, refers to how quickly the hard disk's actuator (the device that moves the head assembly) can position the heads to a random place on the surface of the disk platters. It is a very important performance specification; the lower the number the better and even differences of 1 millisecond can make a difference in performance in some situations.
* Areal Density: This specification refers to how much data the drive packs onto each of its platters. It can be found listed in the product manual for the drive, or you can sometimes estimate it for comparing drives of the same form factor by dividing the size of the drive by the number of platters inside the drive. For example, the largest of the Maxtor DiamondMax 80 series of drives packs 80 GB onto four platters, giving it a rough-cut density of 20 GB per platter. Newer drives pack data more densely, improving both capacity and performance. (Note that some drive sizes in a family may use half of one platter or even some other fraction, so be careful in doing these calculations).
* Sustained Transfer Rate: This specification indicates how fast the drive can stream data off the surface of the platters during sustained reads of many megabytes of data in a row. The higher this figure the better, but small differences between models usually aren't significant. It is most important for those working with large files.
* Interface Speed: Both IDE/ATA and SCSI operate at several standard speeds. For IDE/ATA drives the current standard is Ultra ATA/100, with the "100" standing for the interface's maximum potential throughput, 100 MB/s. In theory, faster interface drives are better, but for most PCs the speed of the interface has little impact on overall hard disk performance, as long as the number is above the maximum sustained transfer rate of the drive (see under "magic numbers" below for more). If you want to run an Ultra ATA/100 drive you need a controller that supports Ultra ATA/100, but even a controller that runs at 66 or 33 MB/s theoretical bandwidth will work OK; the drives are backward compatible.

Quality Selection Criteria: The hard disk is the only component in the PC where a failure means you have a much bigger problem on your hands than merely getting replacement hardware--you have to worry about your data! For this reason, quality is probably more important for this component than it is for any other. Also note that company reputation is a very important quality consideration. Here are some specific quality criteria to look at when evaluating models:

* MTBF: As with power supplies and some other components, MTBF for hard disks stands for mean time between failures. It gives an estimate of the quality of the drive by approximating the number of hours that will elapse between failures when a group of drives of this type are run for millions of aggregate hours under ideal conditions. It does not mean how long you should expect any particular drive to continue running. A model with a significantly larger MTBF figure can be reasonably predicted to last longer than one with a smaller value, but remember that these are just engineering estimates.
* Service Life: The manufacturer's designed life expectancy of the drive. For the stated number of years, the manufacturer of the drive believes the unit will work reliably and safely; beyond that point the drive may continue to work but the chance of problems increases significantly.
* Warranty Length: The number of years the manufacturer warrants the drive. Watch for discrepancies between this figure and the service life of the drive--whichever is lower is what the prudent person will trust!
* Warranty Policies: Some companies provide much better warranty service and coverage than others, and I consider this a quality indicator. See the "Warranty Issues" section below for more.
* Noise and Vibration: As spindle speeds and actuators get faster, drives make more and more noise unless careful engineering is done to counteract it. For some people this is not much of an issue, but for others it is very important. Drives come with objective noise specifications, and most reviewers also assess the amount of noise made by the units they are evaluating. If you are especially sensitive to noise, check out in person the sound level of any model you are considering before you buy; it seems to be a very personal issue.
* Quality and Reliability Features: Most drives come with a number of features that are designed to improve the integrity and reliability of drives. A few of the more important ones you may wish to look for are: "SMART" technology, enhanced shock protection, head load/unload technology, temperature monitoring, and enhanced automatic defect mapping.

Important Features: Hard disks perform a very specific function within the PC, and there aren't typically features put on them to differentiate models as is the case with many other components. The most important "features" of a hard disk for most people are performance, capacity and reliability, and specific features added to drives are usually oriented around improving quality and reliability as described just above.

"Magic Numbers" To Watch For: Hard disks have more than their fair share of magic numbers, and fortunately, some of them are actually important. ^) Here are the ones I see most frequently:

* Capacity: Obviously this is important, as described above, though it is often presented with no performance specifications, as if capacity was all that mattered.
* Spindle Speed: This is also reasonable as magic numbers go. It certainly doesn't tell the whole story, but if you were going to provide only one performance specification, that would be the one for my money.
* Interface Transfer Rate: This is the most overrated performance specification for hard disks, and the one most often used as a selling point. Today's IDE/ATA drives (and controllers) are usually sold as "Ultra ATA/66" or "Ultra ATA/100", where the "66" and "100" are interface transfer rate specifications in MB/s. Unfortunately, in most cases the real performance of the PC is based primarily on the internal performance characteristics of the drive itself, not the interface. The most important thing is to keep the interface transfer rate above the maximum sustained transfer rate of the drive; the rest is gravy, and there are no drives on the market in 2000 that can saturate a 66 MB/s interface, much less a 100 MB/s interface. Don't worry too much about the interface transfer rate on a modern PC, unless you are using a high-end SCSI system with multiple fast drives on it.
* Buffer Size: This refers to the size of the memory buffer or cache within the hard disk. Larger buffers improve performance by a small degree, but not nearly to the extent that some manufacturers would have you believe. A 4 MiB buffer may be four times the size of a 1 MiB buffer but it will likely only make a difference of a couple of percentage points in the performance of the hard disk subsystem. Don't be fooled.

Performance Impact: The hard disk is a very important performance component within the PC. The reason it impacts performance so substantially is that it is a mechanical component, and is therefore thousands of times slower than other key performance components such as the CPU and system memory, which are purely electronic. Upgrading to a newer hard disk can noticeably improve overall system performance.

Retail, OEM and Gray Market Issues: Hard disks are commonly sold in either retail or OEM packaging, and there are important differences between them. For starters, retail drive packages usually come with an installation kit, including a cable, mounting screws, jumpers, and a driver disk; OEM drives usually just come as a bare drive. You may need the retail package in order to easily install some drives, though the hardware is inexpensive and the drivers available from the manufacturer's web site in most cases.

The bigger issue is related to the warranty. Some manufacturers will provide no warranty support on OEM drives (which is why they are cheaper). Others provide a three-year or five-year warranty on all their drives, OEM or retail (but for these OEM drives are often not cheaper--TANSTAAFL). Most manufacturers will also refuse to provide warranty coverage on gray market drives. Be sure to shop around, as in many cases retail-packaged drives can be found for only a few dollars more than OEM drives.

Importance of Manufacturer: There are always some people who insist that one manufacturer makes higher-quality drives than another based on personal experience--and someone else who says the exact opposite. The reality is that in most ways, quality units are made by any of the half-dozen or so big-name hard disk manufacturers. The biggest differences between manufacturers are related to warranty coverage and warranty policies. See below for more on warranty issues.

Typical Component Lifetime: The reliable service life of a typical consumer-level hard disk drive is around three to five years. Some drives work for a decade or longer, but every year that passes after three or so increases the chances of a failure.

Hard drives go obsolete very slowly: you can plug a 10-year-old IDE/ATA drive into a modern system and make it work. However, bigger and faster drives come out every year, so if you care a great deal about performance you will probably find yourself wanting to upgrade to a newer drive in a few years.

Driver Support Issues: To enable the faster transfer modes drivers may be required for some operating systems, especially older ones. These are fairly standard and aren't a big issue any more (though they were at one point). Note that this matter doesn't affect the actual operation of the drive, just its interface to the rest of the PC, and with newer operating systems there isn't really an issue anyway in most cases.

Warranty Issues: There are two important warranty issues related to hard disks (see here for much more on this topic):

* Warranty Coverage: Unpleasant surprises related to warranty status are probably more common with hard disks than with any other component; this is largely due to the matter of OEM drives, which are flooding the marketplace. If you want to sure of warranty coverage on your drive, be careful to purchase either a drive from a manufacturer that has a "no questions asked" warranty policy, or buy a drive that specifically includes consumer warranty coverage from a dealer authorized by that manufacturer. Be wary of very cheap drives from less reputable dealers.
* Warranty Policies: Some manufacturers have much better policies than others when it comes to warranty support. If this is important to you, the first issue is to investigate if the manufacturer you are contemplating traditionally replaces failed drives with new ones or refurbished units, and if the latter, what sort of success people typically have had with them (in some cases these have a lot of problems). The second issue is how quickly the company will replace a failed drive within the warranty period: some are good about immediately cross-shipping replacements, while others will make you wait at a time you can least afford it.

Special Specification Considerations: Here are some additional tips to keep in mind:

* If you are going with a SCSI hard disk you need a SCSI host adapter, and you may want to go with a SCSI optical drive as well.
* Some older systems have BIOS or operating system capacity limits that can cause problems if upgrading to new, large hard disks, especially those over 8 GB in size.
* Hard disks improve in performance rapidly. Don't buy an older model drive if you can get a newer one that is faster for only a few dollars more.
* Don't buy used hard disks. There's absolutely no way to tell if there is a problem with the drive by looking at it, and even running it for a day or two may not reveal problems that the prior owner has decided not to tell you about. It may be fine, but it may not--and it's your data on the line.
* New drives aren't always faster than old ones--there is a trend now towards large, slower drives for low-performance "appliance" applications, so check those specifications.
* You may need mounting rails to put a 3.5" drive into a 5.25" drive bay on certain system cases. Most computer stores sell these for under $10.
* Larger drives cost more than smaller ones of the same drive family, but generally cost less per GB of capacity.
* There can be complications when upgrading certain types of PCs, especially ones that use proprietary components. Some require specific makes or models of drives.

Baca Selengkapnya......

Friday, 6 March 2009

Windows 7 Muncul Enam Versi


Microsoft bakal merilis sistem operasi terbarunya Windows 7, dalam enam versi yang berbeda. Penjelasan itu dimuat dalam situs resmi Microsoft, Selasa 3 Februari 2009.

"Ada banyak segmen pelanggan penting kami, dan kami ingin meyakinkan bahwa kami menyediakan berbagai produk yang cocok untuk setiap orang," ujar General Manager Windows Mike Ybarra.

Menurutnya, salah satu tujuan Windows 7 adalah
upgrade dari versi sebelumnya. Misalnya, para pengguna Vista Basic diharapkan akan meningkat menjadi pengguna Windows 7 versi Basic.

Microsoft juga mengatakan bahwa Windows 7 kali ini bisa beroperasi pada berbagai jenis komputer, mulai dari netbook kelas bawah (low-end) hingga komputer untuk game kelas paling tinggi (highest-end). Lebih lanjut, Ybarra memberikan detilnya:

Windows 7 Starter Edition
Versi ini hanya ditawarkan secara pre-installed oleh OEM (Original Electronic Manufacture). Oleh karenanya ia hanya akan tersedia melalui kanal OEM, pada komputer-komputer PC baru jenis tertentu saja.

Windows 7 Home Basic
Versi ini akan disediakan hanya untuk negara-negara berkembang, di mana konsumen menginginkan versi Windows bagi pemula.

Windows 7 Home Premium
Windows 7 Home Premium adalah salah satu pilihan yang direkomendasikan kepada konsumen, karena diklaim Microsoft bakal memberikan fungsi-fungsi yang lengkap. Versi ini, menurut Microsoft, memberikan pengalaman visual yang kaya, cocok untuk hiburan, juga memudahkan pengguna dalam melakukan koneksi dengan perangkat-perangkat lain.

Windows 7 Proffesional
Versi ini direkomendasikan bagi perusahaan skala kecil dan bagi orang yang bekerja di rumah tapi harus memiliki lingkungan bisnis di mana keamanan dan produktivitas sangat vital. Bagi yang telah menggunakan Windows Vista Business, menurut Microsoft, seharusnya akan 'pindah' ke versi ini.

Windows 7 Ultimate
Versi ini diperuntukkan bagi para penggemar komputer (PC enthusiast) yang menginginkan semua fitur-fitur Windows 7, termasuk fitur-fitur keamanan seperti BitLocker yang diberikan oleh Windows 7 edisi Enterprise.

Windows 7 Enterprise
Versi ini juga disediakan sebagai edisi Enterprise, untuk pelanggan tahunan Microsoft yang terikat Software Assurance agreement. Edisi ini tidak akan tersedia di pasar ritel atau di komputer baru pada kanal OEM. Ia meliputi berbagai fitur untuk bisnis seperti proteksi data, tool manajemen PC, dan fitur-fitur lain yang dirancang untuk mereduksi ongkos perusahaan.

Namun, belum ada penjelasan resmi mengenai harga. Menurut Microsoft Indonesia, Microsoft tak akan membanderol Windows 7 lebih mahal dari harga Windows Vista.


Baca Selengkapnya......

Thursday, 5 March 2009

Windows 7 Performa Lebih Oke Dibanding Vista


Setelah lama dinanti-nanti, Microsoft Corp akhirnya resmi memperkenalkan Windows 7, sistem operasi terbarunya.

Kehadiran pengganti sistem operasi Windows Vista, yang dikenal bermasalah, ini diumumkan dalam presentasi oleh kepala arsitek peranti lunak Microsoft, Ray Ozzie, dalam Professional Developers Conference yang digelar perusahaan itu di Los Angeles, Selasa waktu setempat. Demikian seperti dikutip dari CNN, Rabu (29/10/2008).

Merespons banyaknya keluhan terhadap Vista, Microsoft mengklaim Windows 7 akan lebih cepat dan hanya memakan sedikit memori dalam bekerja. Selama ini Vista dikenal sebagai sistem operasi yang membutuhkan konfigurasi hardware yang mahal, dibandingkan pendahulunya, Windows XP.

Fitur-fitur Windows 7 akan menyederhanakan pekerjaan yang kerap membuat kesal pengguna komputer. Misalnya, fitur Home Group membuat pengguna dapat dengan cepat terkoneksi dengan komputer lain dan peranti keras lainnya.

Julie Larsen-Green, salah satu petinggi Microsoft, dalam konferensi tersebut mendemonstrasikan mudahnya memutar file musik yang berada di komputer lain di dalam jaringan, dan kemudian menyambungkannya ke pengeras suara di tempat lain.

Microsoft juga mengubah desktop taskbar, dan membuat ruang bagi para pengguna untuk menempatkan aplikasi yang paling sering mereka gunakan.

Sistem operasi ini juga memberikan kesempatan pengguna untuk mematikan alert system, dan waktu booting yang lebih cepat dibandingkan Vista. Microsoft juga menambahkan fitur antarmuka multi-sentuh pada Windows 7.

Roger Kay, presiden Endpoint Technologies Associates, mengatakan, secara keseluruhan sistem operasi baru ini mengurangi sejumlah langkah yang biasanya dilalui pengguna saat melakukan sebuah pekerjaan komputer.

Sementara Debby Fry Wilson, direktur senior untuk manajemen produk Windows, mengatakan Microsoft memang sengaja melakukan perubahan radikal dengan sistem operasi baru ini.

Rencananya, Windows 7 baru akan resmi dijual di pasaran pada awal 2010. Sedangkan versi uji cobanya sudah bisa dinikmati awal tahun 2008.

Baca Selengkapnya......
Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.